chipping away at innovation

The Supreme Court, in MGM v. Grokster, recently decided that P2P software manufacturers can be held liable for the infringing activities of people who use their software.

This decision relies on a new theory of liability that measures whether manufacturers created their wares with the intent of inducing consumers to infringe. So now, inventors will not only bear the cost of bringing their products to market, but also the costs of litigation if people begin using their products in illegal ways.

Where exactly will it end?

I sincerely feel for the software companies out there. The only good thing about this decision is the refusal of the Court to disturb Sony.

For a more comprehensive take on the subject, visit your friends and mine, the EFF.